We all know that a business’s sales size is not the best indicator of future revenue potential for the bank. But few business bankers have an accurate but easy way to segment customers based on furture sales opportunity. One bank we have recently profiled under the pseudonym St. Helena has developed a relatively simple way to do just this.
Executives at St. Helena were frustrated to discover that they missed sales opportunities by under-serving smaller businesses with unmet needs while overserving larger businesses with few additional needs. They decided they needed a better way to assign customers to the appropriate channel (Branch RM or Commercial RM) based on need, not simply revenue band.
Although no system perfectly predicts customer need, St. Helena landed on a simple, three part filter to gauge future revenue potential for the bank and determine the appropriate service channel:
- Are deposit volumes low, or have deposit volumes remained stable over the last three years?
- Is the overall credit exposure low, and is the customer a high-quality credit risk? (Be sure to measure size of credit at other banks.)
- Does the customer have limited for-fee products?
Customers who are currently served through a commercial RM but who answer “Yes” to each of these three questions are flagged as low potential and normally moved to the branch RM, while customers currently served through the branch but who answer “No” to any one of these questions usually migrate to the commercial RM. Executives at St. Helena were surprised to find how many customers were misaligned based only on these three filters. When they migrated customers, the commercial bank experienced a 72% increase in overall profitability.
Read more about St. Helena’s work and how they ensure a successful, sustainable realignment process.







